.

Friday, March 22, 2019

Violence in Literature Essay -- Violence Blood Violent Movie Literatur

Violence in LiteratureIm taking you to the bank, Senator Trent. To the blood bank.This line is speak by a character played by Steven Segal in the motion-picture show Hard to Kill, a movie remarkably similar to every otherwise motion picture Segal has ever touched, and depressingly reflective of a larger cultural trend. In Segals movies, characters with names like Orin Boyd and Nico Toscani boast automobile trunk counts and a shared insatiable thirst for vengeance. Death becomes a airscrew employed to dispatch central characters, and a cycle of one-upmanship ensues we saw Segal split up someones throat out in Under Siege, so the next movie has to be more ridiculous in its real level of violence to be marketable. In 1999, it came as no real shock to viewers when Segals character stabbed a Nazi well-wisher in the neck with a broken wine glass. The candor is that engineering science gives us the means to transmit images and messages of unparalleled intensity, and as we do that , reality is recursively recreated. As artists and media moguls say less, they attempt to compensate done force, resulting in a constant barrage of deafening sound that amounts to nothing more than fraudulent scheme or visuals so gaudy and exaggerated that the thin shreds of meaning back tooth them are utterly lost. In this context, death is watered down until it becomes comfortably palpable. Theatres full of families cheer when the hero shoots the bad guy in an operation movie, but it never crosses a single mind that a wrap up has taken place. Viewers wear expressions of smug satisfaction when a crooked lawyer is double-crossed, but the underlying web of lies fazes nobody. In this context, authors have to make fun over the noise to communicate the true evils that float between humans. there is no longer ... ...organization in which individually is sacrificed for the sake of an ideal (Nazism, in this case), its easy for a smaller assemblage to become victimized. That grou p is doubly under attack from without and within, and even after the battle is simply over, they are still losing. The inherent threat in such organizational bodies has to be recognized by humanity and ingrained into the memories of future generations to escort that these mistakes arent repeated. Bringing distressing images and situations the forefront of art isnt gimmicky, and it isnt entertaining. Its indispensable. When punches are held the point is only half-made. Vividly bringing to life the tragedies of the world is the only way in which we can come to empathise them with any validity, and understanding these heartrending circumstances is the only means through which we can learn from them.

No comments:

Post a Comment