Kant Essay -- essays research papers

Utilitarianism is a consequential perspective, in that, a conclusiveness in based on the effects it ----will have on community and what it will generally lead to. Also, the utility or usefulness of an fulfill is destined by the amount of happiness that will result. Therefore, no meet in itself move be deemed wrong consequence alone argon the important matter. Using this principle, one should consider the attainable results of each potence inciteion. unmatchable clear flaw of the utilitarian perspective is there that there seems to be a lack of the concept of justice. Their moral principles would justify doing experiments on a single man with no friends or family. The justification would placid exist in a case in which the experiments would cause a man to die, to date benefits make outred because substantial medical knowledge was obtained. There likewise seems to be no intrinsic value placed upon human breeding, yet the value is placed upon the happiness of the greatest of people.Utilitarianism follows one of two categories act and rule. With Act Utilitarianism, all possible actions are considered and one moldiness determine which action would yield the most happiness or benefits for the greatest round of people. However, with act utilitarianism, there really is no way of determining if the advanced choice of actions was carried out. Also, there is no clear way to be original on what the results of the actions will be. For example, there is no way to be surely that a severely impaired infant will not domesticize enough to live a better animation that what was predicted. However, acting chastely doesnt mean acting omniscient. A liable effort must be made to get relevant data to predict the possible consequences of all actions involved.Another form of utilitarianism would be rule utilitarianism. This moral mensuration suggest that an action is right if it follows a specific rule that has been coordinate and validated while keeping the prin ciple of utility in mind. A rule utilitarian would not concern themselves with the utility of specific or individual cases, but would follow a set of particular rules. One would not have to go through the process of calculations involved in determining maximum utility, but a particular rule would... ...th Ross ethics. rase in the case involving Alice Nuvo and her not wanting treatment my moral light came into play. Under most circumstances, my position is strictly to say that human life can never be allowed to pass if there is a reasonable means of preserving it. However, there can be no rules for me to follow because I find exceptions to this, and the case of Alice Nuvo would be much(prenominal) a case. I command that her autonomy surpasses any medical judgment. If she wants to be allowed to live out her life with her family and inevitably die, it should be her choice. Especially in a case such as this, I really have no way of reviewing my actions and comprehend what rules I f ollowed or what past cases I referred to. Once again, my moral information lead me to decide for her autonomy. However, moral intuition does not instantly occur when deciding on a case. There must be diligent review of every aspect, action, and possible consequences before your moral intuition can decide upon anything. After reviewing my decision scenarios, and taking into account the beliefs of utilitarianism, Kants ethics, and Ross ethics, I. without a doubt, that I am a follower of Ross.